Cost-Effective Proposal for Wain Park Pickleball: In a recent turn of events, the North Saanich council’s decision to reject a proposed compromise on the Wain Park pickleball courts has drawn significant criticism. The courts, previously a vibrant and integral part of the community, have now become a symbol of failed negotiation and missed opportunities.
For residents of Central Saanich, the closure of the Wain Park pickleball courts has been particularly disheartening. These courts were more than just a place to play; they served as a social hub where players formed connections and friendships. The loss of this amenity has been deeply felt by those who frequented it.
A Practical Solution
Jack McClintock proposed a cost-effective solution to keep the courts open by installing sound dampeners for less than $30,000. The community was prepared to contribute approximately $8,000 toward this expense, and Celia Stock supported this motion. This compromise aimed to balance the interests of all parties involved while keeping the courts available to the public.
Council’s Rejection
Despite the practical nature of McClintock’s proposal, the majority of council members, including the mayor, voted against reopening the courts. Data from Oak Bay’s courts, which showed the efficacy of sound panels in reducing noise, was presented but ignored. This decision raises questions about why the council chose not to address the noise issue with an effective and affordable solution.
The decision to close the courts, seemingly in response to the complaints of a few neighbors, contrasts sharply with the support shown by over 1,500 petition signers, including more than 500 from North Saanich. This disparity highlights a disconnect between the council’s actions and the wishes of the broader community.
Financial Considerations
Reports indicate that the mayor had previously assured a small group of residents that the courts would be closed. However, the financial implications of this decision are significant. The $35,000 cost for noise mitigation is substantially lower than the estimated $500,000 required to construct new courts elsewhere. This financial disparity shows the imprudence of rejecting the proposed solution.
Councillors McClintock and Stock are viewed as the voices of reason on the council, showing a commitment to fiscal responsibility and community needs. Their support for the existing courts reflects a thoughtful approach to managing public resources.
The Need for Accountability
In light of recent events, it is suggested that the mayor address the misleading comments made regarding the pickleball courts. An apology to the constituents and the wider pickleball community is seen as necessary to restore trust and show a genuine commitment to addressing community concerns.
