Ojai’s Pickleball Courts in Danger: The pickleball question has come to a head in Ojai, California, as voters prepare to decide on Measure O. This local ballot initiative is asking residents whether the four pickleball courts at Ojai City Hall should remain open to the public year-round or stay closed. The decision will hinge on the voters’ stance about public access, noise mitigation, and overall community impact. On September 27th, representatives from both sides of the issue sat down with the Ojai Valley News to explain their positions.
Voices on Both Sides of Measure O
Proponents of Measure O argue for consistent public access to the pickleball courts, emphasizing the benefits of promoting an active lifestyle. Leading the “Yes on Measure O” side are Tim and Brenda Krout, along with Leslie Clark. They believe the community deserves unrestricted use of these racquet sport courts without needing additional city permits or restrictions. Their stance centers on ensuring that Ojai residents can enjoy the space without bureaucratic red tape, especially since the courts were designed for public use.
Meanwhile, the opposition—represented by Karin Quimby and Jessica McCrea—expresses concerns over noise pollution in pickleball courts and potential disturbances to nearby residents. They’re pushing for more thoughtful planning around the courts, suggesting the need for sound mitigation efforts before allowing full access.
The Ballot Question
At the heart of the debate is a straightforward but question for Ojai voters:
“Shall an ordinance requiring the four pickleball courts at the Ojai City Hall, 401 South Ventura Street, Ojai, California, to be kept open to the public year-round, without any other City permission or permits, and implementing sound mitigation and adverse impacts efforts, be adopted?”
This phrasing is crucial, as it ties the issue of public access directly to the responsibility of implementing measures to reduce noise and other community disruptions.
A Community-Driven Measure
Measure O came to be through California’s initiative process, driven by residents who want the courts to stay open for public use. The conversation around this initiative reflects larger issues about how public spaces are managed and how communities balance recreational access with the need for environmental and neighborhood considerations.
The coming vote will determine not only the future of the pickleball courts at Ojai City Hall but also the precedent for how public land is utilized in this small California city.
News in Brief : Ojai’s Pickleball Courts in Danger
Measure O, which asks voters whether the pickleball courts at Ojai City Hall should remain open year-round, has sparked debate in Ojai, California. Proponents argue for full public access, while opponents worry about noise and disturbances. The ballot measure also includes a provision for sound mitigation. Residents on both sides of the issue, including Tim and Brenda Krout (for) and Karin Quimby and Jessica McCrea (against), expressed their views in a recent interview. The decision will hinge on how Ojai voters weigh the benefits of recreational access against neighborhood concerns.
ALSO READ : Best Pickleball Courts in Mount Pearl: Ultimate Venues foe the Sport
